Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] Add do_maple_tree support for maple tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:39 PM <crash-utility-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:38:24 +0800
> From: Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  [PATCH v2 5/6] Add do_maple_tree support for
>         maple tree
> Message-ID: <20221025123825.36421-6-ltao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-default=true
>
> do_maple_tree() is similar to do_radix_tree() and do_xarray(), which
> takes the same do_maple_tree_traverse entry as tree cmd. Currently
> do_maple_tree() is not called by any other functions, we reserve it
> for future use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  defs.h       |   6 +++
>  maple_tree.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
> index 3f2453e..827e561 100644
> --- a/defs.h
> +++ b/defs.h
> @@ -5581,6 +5581,12 @@ int cleanup_memory_driver(void);
>
>  void maple_init(void);
>  int do_mptree(struct tree_data *);
> +ulong do_maple_tree(ulong, int, struct list_pair *);
> +#define MAPLE_TREE_COUNT   (1)
> +#define MAPLE_TREE_SEARCH  (2)
> +#define MAPLE_TREE_DUMP    (3)
> +#define MAPLE_TREE_GATHER  (4)
> +#define MAPLE_TREE_DUMP_CB (5)
>
>  /*
>   *  help.c
> diff --git a/maple_tree.c b/maple_tree.c
> index 33903cb..e8a287a 100644
> --- a/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/maple_tree.c
> @@ -805,6 +805,13 @@ struct cmd_tree_info {
>         struct tree_data *td;
>  } cmd_tree_info;
>
> +struct maple_tree_ops {
> +       void (*entry)(ulong node, ulong slot, const char *path,
> +                     ulong index, void *private);
> +       uint radix;
> +       void *private;
> +} maple_tree_ops;
> +
>  static const char spaces[] = "                                ";
>
>  static void do_mt_range64(const struct maple_tree *, void *,
> @@ -1028,6 +1035,10 @@ static void do_mt_entry(void *entry, unsigned long min, unsigned long max,
>         int print_radix = 0, i;
>         static struct req_entry **e = NULL;
>
> +       if (maple_tree_ops.entry)
> +               maple_tree_ops.entry((ulong)entry, (ulong)entry, path, max,
> +                                    maple_tree_ops.private);
> +
>         if (!cmd_tree_info.td)
>                 return;
>
> @@ -1162,12 +1173,150 @@ int do_mptree(struct tree_data *td)
>         int is_root = !(td->flags & TREE_NODE_POINTER);
>
>         memset(&cmd_tree_info, 0, sizeof(cmd_tree_info));
> +       memset(&maple_tree_ops, 0, sizeof(maple_tree_ops));

See comments below.

>         cmd_tree_info.td = td;
>         do_maple_tree_traverse(td->start, is_root);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +/*************For do_maple_tree*****************/
> +static void do_maple_tree_count(ulong node, ulong slot, const char *path,
> +                               ulong index, void *private)
> +{
> +       struct do_maple_tree_info *info = private;
> +       info->count++;
> +}
> +
> +static void do_maple_tree_search(ulong node, ulong slot, const char *path,
> +                                ulong index, void *private)
> +{
> +       struct do_maple_tree_info *info = private;
> +       struct list_pair *rtp = info->data;
> +
> +       if (rtp->index == index) {
> +               rtp->value = (void *)slot;
> +               info->count = 1;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static void do_maple_tree_dump(ulong node, ulong slot, const char *path,
> +                              ulong index, void *private)
> +{
> +       struct do_maple_tree_info *info = private;
> +       fprintf(fp, "[%lu] %lx\n", index, slot);
> +       info->count++;
> +}
> +
> +static void do_maple_tree_gather(ulong node, ulong slot, const char *path,
> +                                ulong index, void *private)
> +{
> +       struct do_maple_tree_info *info = private;
> +       struct list_pair *rtp = info->data;
> +
> +       if (info->maxcount) {
> +               rtp[info->count].index = index;
> +               rtp[info->count].value = (void *)slot;
> +
> +               info->count++;
> +               info->maxcount--;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static void do_maple_tree_dump_cb(ulong node, ulong slot, const char *path,
> +                                 ulong index, void *private)
> +{
> +       struct do_maple_tree_info *info = private;
> +       struct list_pair *rtp = info->data;
> +       int (*cb)(ulong) = rtp->value;
> +
> +       /* Caller defined operation */
> +       if (!cb(slot)) {
> +               error(FATAL, "do_maple_tree: callback "
> +                     "operation failed: entry: %ld  item: %lx\n",
> +                     info->count, slot);
> +       }
> +       info->count++;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + *  do_maple_tree argument usage:
> + *
> + *    root: Address of a maple_tree_root structure
> + *
> + *    flag: MAPLE_TREE_COUNT - Return the number of entries in the tree.
> + *          MAPLE_TREE_SEARCH - Search for an entry at rtp->index; if found,
> + *            store the entry in rtp->value and return a count of 1; otherwise
> + *            return a count of 0.
> + *          MAPLE_TREE_DUMP - Dump all existing index/value pairs.
> + *          MAPLE_TREE_GATHER - Store all existing index/value pairs in the
> + *            passed-in array of list_pair structs starting at rtp,
> + *            returning the count of entries stored; the caller can/should
> + *            limit the number of returned entries by putting the array size
> + *            (max count) in the rtp->index field of the first structure
> + *            in the passed-in array.
> + *          MAPLE_TREE_DUMP_CB - Similar with MAPLE_TREE_DUMP, but for each
> + *            maple tree entry, a user defined callback at rtp->value will
> + *            be invoked.
> + *
> + *     rtp: Unused by MAPLE_TREE_COUNT and MAPLE_TREE_DUMP.
             ^^^
> + *          A pointer to a list_pair structure for MAPLE_TREE_SEARCH.
> + *          A pointer to an array of list_pair structures for
> + *          MAPLE_TREE_GATHER; the dimension (max count) of the array may
> + *          be stored in the index field of the first structure to avoid
> + *          any chance of an overrun.
> + *          For MAPLE_TREE_DUMP_CB, the rtp->value must be initialized as a
> + *          callback function.  The callback prototype must be: int (*)(ulong);
> + */
> +ulong
> +do_maple_tree(ulong root, int flag, struct list_pair *rtp)

The parameter name "rtp" looks a bit weird, could you please replace
the "rtp" with the "lp" and  update the above comment?

> +{
> +       struct do_maple_tree_info info = {
> +               .count          = 0,
> +               .data           = rtp,
Ditto.

> +       };
> +
> +       memset(&maple_tree_ops, 0, sizeof(maple_tree_ops));
> +       memset(&cmd_tree_info, 0, sizeof(cmd_tree_info));
> +       maple_tree_ops.private = &info;

Think about it again.  It could be good to use a local variable and
eventually pass the ops parameter to do_maple_tree_traverse(). Just
like:

//filesys.c
        struct do_radix_tree_info info = {
                .count          = 0,
                .data           = rtp,
        };
        struct radix_tree_ops ops = {
                .radix          = 16,
                .private        = &info,
        };


> +
> +       switch (flag)
> +       {
> +       case MAPLE_TREE_COUNT:
> +               maple_tree_ops.entry = do_maple_tree_count;
> +               break;
> +
> +       case MAPLE_TREE_SEARCH:
> +               maple_tree_ops.entry = do_maple_tree_search;
> +               break;
> +
> +       case MAPLE_TREE_DUMP:
> +               maple_tree_ops.entry = do_maple_tree_dump;
> +               break;
> +
> +       case MAPLE_TREE_GATHER:
> +               if (!(info.maxcount = rtp->index))
> +                       info.maxcount = (ulong)(-1);   /* caller beware */
> +
> +               maple_tree_ops.entry = do_maple_tree_gather;
> +               break;
> +
> +       case MAPLE_TREE_DUMP_CB:
> +               if (rtp->value == NULL) {
> +                       error(FATAL, "do_maple_tree: need set callback function");
> +                       return -EINVAL;

The above "return" seems to be redundant.

Thanks.
Lianbo
> +               }
> +               maple_tree_ops.entry = do_maple_tree_dump_cb;
> +               break;
> +
> +       default:
> +               error(FATAL, "do_maple_tree: invalid flag: %lx\n", flag);
> +       }
> +
> +       do_maple_tree_traverse(root, true);
> +       return info.count;
> +}
> +
>  /***********************************************/
>  void maple_init(void)
>  {
> --
> 2.33.1

--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux