Re: [PATCH 1/2] ps: Add support to "ps -l" to properly display process list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----Original Message-----
> 	Hi Lianbo,
> 
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	> >> diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
> 	> >> index 7d386d2..ed2f5ca 100644
> 	> >> --- a/defs.h
> 	> >> +++ b/defs.h
> 	> >> @@ -1768,6 +1768,8 @@ struct offset_table {                    /* stash of commonly-used offsets
> */
> 	> >>         long vcpu_struct_rq;
> 	> >>         long task_struct_sched_info;
> 	> >>         long sched_info_last_arrival;
> 	> >> +       long task_struct_sched_entity;
> 	> >> +       long se_exec_start;
> 	> >
> 	> >
> 	> > This can be only appended to the end of the offset_table.
> 	> > For more details, refer to the section "writing patches" in wiki:
> 	> > https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
> 
> 	Seeing this exchange and thought of something like this:
> 
> 	--- a/defs.h
> 	+++ b/defs.h
> 	@@ -1215,8 +1215,8 @@ struct reference {
> 	        void *refp;
> 	 };
> 
> 	-struct offset_table {                    /* stash of commonly-used offsets */
> 	-       long list_head_next;             /* add new entries to end of table */
> 	+struct offset_table {          /* NOTE: add new entries to end of table [1] */
> 	+       long list_head_next;    /* [1] https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki */
> 	        long list_head_prev;
> 	        long task_struct_pid;
> 	        long task_struct_state;
> 
> 
> 	With this patch, a patch trying to add an entry to the middle of the table:
> 
> 	diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
> 	index 938e39ca4baf..c0814482abaa 100644
> 	--- a/defs.h
> 	+++ b/defs.h
> 	@@ -2007,6 +2007,7 @@ struct offset_table {             /* NOTE: add new entries to end of table
> [1] */
> 	        long mm_struct_mm_count;
> 	        long task_struct_thread_reg29;
> 	        long task_struct_thread_reg31;
> 	+       long foo_bar;
> 	        long pt_regs_regs;
> 	        long pt_regs_cp0_badvaddr;
> 	        long address_space_page_tree;
> 
> 
> 	Having this even only for the offset_table, size_table and array_table
> 	might be effective to let developers notice that rule.
> 
> 
> That might help, but it may still be ignored.

Yes, just an small improvement in the current process we have.

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	What do you think?  Attached a patch.
> 
> 
> 
> Tried to add the contribution guidelines at the end of email, like this:
> --
> Crash-utility mailing list
> Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx>
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
> Contribution Guidlines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki

This looks good, thanks.

> 
> Or do we have a script to check the patch rules? Just like the checkpatch.pl <http://checkpatch.pl>  in
> the kernel?

This also sounds good.  It also may be missed, so an ideal would be
an automated patch test running when a patch is posted..

Thanks,
Kazu


--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux