-----Original Message----- > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 1:25 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) > <k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 11:17 AM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx > <mailto:k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Pingfan, Lianbo, > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:43 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) > > > > <k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx <mailto:k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Here is a patch for the issue reported by Ankur. > > > > > Could you help test this with your ramdumps and arm64 machines? > > > > > > > > > The patch looks good to me. And I will schedule a machine to have a test. > > > > > > Pingfan, thank you for the check and test, it's very helpful. > > > > > > Ankur told me that the patch was working fine. > > > > > > Lianbo, my understanding is that to get a raw ramdump, hardware functionality > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean that the raw dumpfile had been generated on my machine, but it didn't reproduce > > > this issue. :-) > > > > oh ok, I misread your email.. Thanks for the test and ack. > > > Besides, this patch also works fine on dump core which has > vmcore_info. Hence no regression. Thank you guys for testing this, applied. Kazu -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
