-----Original Message-----
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:17 AM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
> <k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ankur,
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> assign page_offset and kvbase based on VA_BITS passed
> > > >>
> > >
> > > >Thank you for the patch, Ankur.
> > > >Can you help to describe the reason in detail? And what happened?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Lianbo, Raw ramdump without vmcoreinfo doesn't work here.
> > > read_vmcoreinfo("NUMBER(BA_BITS)") will not work on raw ramdump.
> > > getting below error
> > >
>
> Thank you for the information, Ankur.
>
> > > crash_64: vmlinux and /var/tmp/ramdump_elf_XUtCMT do not match!
> > > Usage:
> > > crash [OPTION]... NAMELIST MEMORY-IMAGE[@address <https://github.com/address> ] (dumpfile form)
> > > crash [OPTION]... [NAMELIST] (live system form)
> > > Enter "crash_64 -h" for details.
> > >
> > > Recent change https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/167d37e347fe35c6f7db826e8539e192c4375564
> is
> > > causing this issue, before this change VA_BITS_ACTUAL was used which is passed from cmd line.
> >
> > ok, I see, but I'm not sure why your patch uses the (pc->flags2 & SNAP) condition.
>
> This seems not very reasonable, the SNAP flag has a specific use.
>
> > The calculation used VA_BITS_ACTUAL (== VA_BITS for ramdump) before the change,
> > so how about the following patch?
> >./crash
> > diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
> > index 7069312671cf..da78acbb013f 100644
> > --- a/arm64.c
> > +++ b/arm64.c
> > @@ -4031,6 +4031,9 @@ arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void)
> > error(FATAL, "cannot determine VA_BITS_ACTUAL\n");
> > }
> >
> > + if (!machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS) /* guess */
> > + machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS = machedp->machspec->VA_BITS;
> > +
>
> Looks good.
Thanks, but I'm rethinking about their meanings.
The VA_BITS is a macro replaced with CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS in the kernel
and used to calculate PAGE_OFFSET.
#define VA_BITS (CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS)
#define _PAGE_OFFSET(va) (-(UL(1) << (va)))
#define PAGE_OFFSET (_PAGE_OFFSET(VA_BITS))
It looks like we should set ms->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS only for the value
got from the kernel config or vmcoreinfo. On the other hand, ms->VA_BITS
can be calculated from other information in crash.
So should we use ms->VA_BITS for ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET like this?
diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
index 7069312671cf..f33b6c28a3bc 100644
--- a/arm64.c
+++ b/arm64.c
@@ -4031,6 +4031,9 @@ arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void)
error(FATAL, "cannot determine VA_BITS_ACTUAL\n");
}
+ if (!machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS)
+ machdep->machspec->VA_BITS = machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS;
+
/*
* The mm flip commit is introduced before 52-bits VA, which is before the
* commit to export NUMBER(TCR_EL1_T1SZ)
diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
index cbd45e52f9da..c4438b357259 100644
--- a/defs.h
+++ b/defs.h
@@ -3239,7 +3239,7 @@ typedef signed int s32;
#define ARM64_PAGE_OFFSET ((0xffffffffffffffffUL) \
<< (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS - 1))
/* kernels >= v5.4 the kernel VA space is flipped */
-#define ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET (-(1UL) << machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS)
+#define ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET (-(1UL) << machdep->machspec->VA_BITS)
#define ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET_ACTUAL ((0xffffffffffffffffUL) \
- ((1UL) << machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL) + 1)
>
> > /*
> > * The mm flip commit is introduced before 52-bits VA, which is before the
> > * commit to export NUMBER(TCR_EL1_T1SZ)
> >
>
> BTW: Can we also try to get its value from kernel config? But this
> relies on kernel config: CONFIG_IKCONFIG.
The IKCONFIG_AVAIL flag is set by IKCFG_INIT here:
read_in_kernel_config(IKCFG_INIT);
kernel_init();
machdep_init(POST_GDB);
The get_kernel_config() cannot be used in machdep_init(PRE_GDB).
Thanks,
Kazu
>
> diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
> index 7069312..79f9929 100644
> --- a/arm64.c
> +++ b/arm64.c
> @@ -3989,6 +3989,10 @@ arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void)
> value = atol(string);
> free(string);
> machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS = value;
> + } else if (kt->ikconfig_flags & IKCONFIG_AVAIL) {
> + if ((get_kernel_config("CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS",
> + &string)) == IKCONFIG_STR)
> + machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS = atol(string);
> }
>
> if (kernel_symbol_exists("vabits_actual")) {
>
> Thanks.
> Lianbo
> > > 3987 static void
> > > 3988 arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void)
> > > 3989 {
> > > 3990 int bitval;
> > > 3991 struct syment *sp;
> > > 3992 ulong vabits_actual, value;
> > > 3993 char *string;
> > > 3994
> > > 3995 if ((string = pc->read_vmcoreinfo("NUMBER(VA_BITS)"))) {
> > > 3996 value = atol(string);
> > > 3997 free(string);
> > > 3998 machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS = value;
> > > 3999 }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Thanks.
> > > >Lianbo
> > >
> > > >> Change-Id: I525f3c7fd91e1f06e909c2f4c1749c44c068baea
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Ankur Bansal <er.ankurbansal@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:er.ankurbansal@xxxxxxxxx> >
> > > >> ---
> > > >> arm64.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > > >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
> > > >> index 7069312..2dc77f7 100644
> > > >> --- a/arm64.c
> > > >> +++ b/arm64.c
> > > >> @@ -220,10 +220,17 @@ arm64_init(int when)
> > > >>
> > > >> /* vabits_actual introduced after mm flip, so it should be flipped layout */
> > > >> if (ms->VA_BITS_ACTUAL) {
> > > >> - ms->page_offset = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET;
> > > >> - /* useless on arm64 */
> > > >> - machdep->identity_map_base = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET;
> > > >> - machdep->kvbase = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET;
> > > >> + if ((pc->flags2 & SNAP)) {
> > > >> + ms->page_offset = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET;
> > > >> + /* useless on arm64 */
> > > >> + machdep->identity_map_base = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET;
> > > >> + machdep->kvbase = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET;
> > > >> + }
> > > >> + else{
> > > >> + ms->page_offset = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET_ACTUAL;
> > > >> + machdep->identity_map_base = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET_ACTUAL;
> > > >> + machdep->kvbase = ARM64_FLIP_PAGE_OFFSET_ACTUAL;
> > > >> + }
> > > >> ms->userspace_top = ARM64_USERSPACE_TOP_ACTUAL;
> > > >> } else {
> > > >> ms->page_offset = ARM64_PAGE_OFFSET;
> > > >> --
> > > >> 2.7.4
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > --
> > > Crash-utility mailing list
> > > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
> > >
> > > End of Crash-utility Digest, Vol 192, Issue 28
> > > **********************************************
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
