-----Original Message----- > Hi, Firo > Thank you for the explanation. > I have no objection, because it's just a cosmetic change in the code > style. Acked-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Lianbo, after thinking about this code for a while, I think the code > > refactoring is not necessary because > > 1) the original code makes more sense to express the mutual exclusive > > semantics between -H (ld->flags & LIST_HEAD_POINTER) and -h. > > > > 2) LIST_HEAD_OFFSET_ENTERED and LIST_OFFSET_ENTERED don't have to > > be at same level because LIST_HEAD_OFFSET_ENTERED is just a sub-option for -h. > > > > So please consider accepting the original patch. Ok, applied with some cosmetic adjustments I found. https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/f091b5e76d2d6e81b12cd40df7b5863c9e2efed1 Thanks, Kazu -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
