> static int setup_ikconfig(char *config) > @@ -10265,8 +10273,8 @@ static int setup_ikconfig(char *config) > ent++; > > if (STRNEQ(ent, "CONFIG_")) { Another natural fix to me is to extend the condition like: if (STRNEQ(ent, "CONFIG_") && strstr(ent, "=")) { But I also think the current one is good. > - add_ikconfig_entry(ent, > - &ikconfig_all[kt->ikconfig_ents++]); > + if (add_ikconfig_entry(ent, &ikconfig_all[kt->ikconfig_ents])) > + kt->ikconfig_ents++; > if (kt->ikconfig_ents == IKCONFIG_MAX) { > error(WARNING, "ikconfig overflow.\n"); > return 1; > -- > 2.17.1 > > > Thanks. HATAYAMA, Daisuke -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility