Re: Update gdb to 10.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alexey,

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:31 AM Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’m thinking to update gdb to recent version.
> Are there any concerns?
> What should I know? Any dependencies which force us to stick to 7.6?
>
> The features I’m aiming are:
> 1) `offset` support in add-symbol-file, can be used to provide kaslr_offset to gdb
> 2) remove-symbol-file - can be used to remove original symbols after finding kaslr_offset

Thanks for raising this. I have recently started work (mainly from
RHEL p-o-v) to evaluate crash porting to gdb-10.1 as we need right now
to keep some additional patches in upstream crash code to help fix
issues, for example:
- ppc64le enablement,
- other fixes picked from gdb upstream which fix some issues with gdb-7.6

There is a case for using gdb-10.1 to avoid such patches. However, I
am still in the very preliminary stage of the evaluation.

> My high-level goal is to give gdb more resources (access to registers, memory, machine info - such as number CPUs), so we can use useful gdb commands as:
> bt, frame, info locals

Makes sense.

Let me know if you need any help from my side for the same. I plan to
try some more for the porting (from RHEL-p-o-v) this weekend - maybe I
will come back with more updates on the same early next week.

Thanks,
Bhupesh


--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux