Re: Crash-utility Digest, Vol 180, Issue 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2020年09月04日 21:53, crash-utility-request@xxxxxxxxxx 写道:
> Date: Thu,  3 Sep 2020 21:28:45 +0100
> From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
> To: crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  [PATCH 0/2] extensions/trace: Sync up with
> 	v5.8	struct renaming
> Message-ID: <20200903202847.31018-1-valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Trying to use the trace extension on a mainline kernel doesn't work, and it
> stems from some struct renaming that has happened upstream.
> 
> These two patches update the internal naming to match the upstream one, and
> includes some backwards-compatibility checks to figure out which naming version
> to use depending on what symbols are available.
> 
> This was briefly tested on on both v5.4 and 5.9-rc1 kernels using QEMU's
> dump-guest-memory. The kernel starts tracing some sched & initicall stuff from
> boot, and "trace show" behaves just fine on both of these. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Valentin
> 
> Valentin Schneider (2):
>   extensions/trace: Rename trace_buffer to array_buffer
>   extensions/trace: Rename ring_buffer to trace_buffer
> 
>  extensions/trace.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
Thanks for the fix. This series looks good to me.

Acked-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx>

> --
> 2.27.0

--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux