----- Original Message ----- > Hi Dave, > > I build the proccgroup extensions on > https://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions/proccgroup.c. > and find a bug on centos 7. the following patch fix it. Normally the owner/maintainer listed is responsible to accept any changes to their module. But since it's an obvious fix, I have gone ahead and updated https://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions/proccgroup.c and I've cc'd the owner/maintainer. > I also want to ask another question: > Why not put various extensions in the extensions directory of the source code? Because that would imply some expectation of ongoing support, and I am absolutely not interested in doing that. Thanks, Dave > > Wang Long (1): > extensions: proccgroup: fix the wrong method which detect whether to > support getting subsys name > > extensions/proccgroup.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > > > -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
