On Tue 2019-07-09 15:34 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > Hi Aaron, Hi Dave, > I didn't mean to scare you off, but at the same time I think you > understand how strongly I prefer to avoid screwing around with the > gdb code unless it's absolutely necessary. (Not to mention that > the dual-patching of printcmd.c by both gdb-7.6.patch and the > gdb-7.6-ppc64le-support.patch, may have made it unworkable.) Not at all. I understand. Unfortunately, I was on holiday so didn't have an opportunity to follow up. > So I took my own advice, and implemented the "dis -[rf] address count" > capability with a simple patch to the top-level kernel.c disassembly > code: > > https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/6c891b667f75543db279e1a29bf3d646a83d175d Excellent - I was working on a similar solution today anyway. Thanks, -- Aaron Tomlin -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
