----- Original Message ----- > Hi. > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:39:18PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > This makes the output somewhat sparse, ugly, and hard to read, no? > > In a way that there are might be empty CPUs? If so, yes, I agree. > > > I'm wondering if it would be more readable if you just recognize the > > expired entries, and maybe display something like "[EXPIRED]" at the > > end of the expired entry's line? It wouldn't even require the "-e", > > but just have it do it all the time. > > Bringing this idea forward and combining with my next planned steps, I'd > suggest just adding another column, which would show the diff in time > between the clock and the timer expiration, preferably, in a > human-readable format (converted to seconds). Expired entries would go > with "-" sign. > > What do you think? Sound reasonable -- let's see what it looks like. Thanks, Dave > > -- > Best regards, > Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum) > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer > -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
