On Mon, 20 May 2019 10:49:01 +0200 Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 20 May 2019 11:28:30 +0300 > Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 20.05.19 г. 11:24 ч., Honglei Wang wrote: > > > Hi Nikolay, > > > > > > I don't think we can do the s390 analysis just use the x86_64 crash > > > utility directly. I'm not familiar with cross build, but seems this > > > linkage might help: > > > > > > https://developer.ibm.com/linuxonpower/2017/07/06/analyzing-openpower-kernel-dump-information-laptop/ > > > > This is exactly which got me started into trying to understand what it > > takes to analyse s390 on x86_64. . Hence I've referenced the function > > which is supposed to verify that a particular combination of host and > > target is supported. I'm now interested in understanding why s390 on > > x86_64 is not supported. > > Heh, been there already... ;-) > > That's for many reasons. Bernhard Walle tried to make a crosscrash > package many years ago. The necessary changes were quite intrusive, and > Dave wrote clearly that this was unlikely to get merged any time soon. > > I still thought it was a good idea, so as a Hackweek project I started > writing a tool that can automatically convert the crash utility to a > cross-platform variant. The (abandoned) sources can be found at > GitHub[1]. IIRC this work was based on crash-6.0.5, it most likely fails > miserably with any other version. ;-) I deleted the link by mistake. Here it is: [1] https://github.com/ptesarik/xcrash-scripts Petr T
Attachment:
pgp6Pv7nNGD3d.pgp
Description: Digitálnà podpis OpenPGP
-- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
