----- Original Message ----- > Hi Dave, > > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 11:46:33 -0400 (EDT) > Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > crash currently fails on linux-next kernel due to another radix-tree rework. > > > The patch attached fixes this. > > > > > > BTW, is there an 'official policy' about fixing linux-next issues, as commits > > > can be changed/dropped on their way to the linux repo? > > > > Hi Philipp, > > > > Not really, although since your fixes will not affect the current mechanism, > > they should be safe to apply. > > Ok. I'm mainly asking because we are building up an environment for automated > (kernel) tests on s390, including tests on linux-next. In this context we also > have a test if crash starts with a given kernel. That's why I expect more > fixes/bugs like this to come in the future. Excellent -- I appreciate that! > > I'm not really sure what's the best way to handle them. On one hand it would be > nice when crash could read those kernels. On the other I don't want to clutter > the code with fixes for patches that don't make it upstream. Do you have a > preferred way to handle similar bugs in the future? Recently I have been trying to be as proactive as possible, although I only go as far as sanity-testing upstream -rc kernels as they get released (i.e. not linux-next). On the other hand, I'm about to check in the first phase of support for ARM64 52-bit virtual addressing, which has not yet made it into the mainstream kernel. In that case, it's pretty certain that those changes will be accepted. And I would presume that stuff that Matthew Wilcox has queued up for Xarray are a pretty safe bet as well. So let's take it on a case-by-case basis. > > > But I note that your changes only address the basic task initialization > > sequence and the "bpf" and the "ipcs" commands. Did you also look > > into the "files -p", "irq" and "tree -t -p" options? > > You are right I missed those. "files -p" however seems to work fine with the > patch I sent. For the other two I'll prepare a v2. Nice -- thanks! Dave > Thanks > Philipp > > > > > Thanks, > > Dave > > > > PS: the > > > > " > > > > > > Thanks > > > Philipp > > > > > > Philipp Rudo (1): > > > Fix for XArray/radix_tree rework on linux-next > > > > > > bpf.c | 7 ++++++- > > > ipcs.c | 5 ++++- > > > task.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.16.4 > > > > > > > > > > -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility