----- Original Message -----
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> With kernels where LRUs are moved to node and thus vm_stat is
> >> split into zone and node, crash utility fails to show the vmstat with
> >> "kmem
> >> -V", and the "CACHED" of kmem -i is shown as zero.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Nice -- thanks for catching this!
> >
> > But can you re-send the patch as an attachment? It appears that the
> > inlined patch below has all tabs replaced with spaces:
> >
> Sure. Attached.
Hi Vinayak,
I understand that this kernel change was introduced in 4.8, and
I don't have a lot of 4.8 and later kernels to test with.
But of the ones I do have, the 4.8, 4.13 and 4.14 kernels tested OK,
but both of my 4.11.0-based kernels show the same type of bogus
CACHED values:
crash> kmem -i
PAGES TOTAL PERCENTAGE
TOTAL MEM 970244 3.7 GB ----
FREE 225486 880.8 MB 23% of TOTAL MEM
USED 744758 2.8 GB 76% of TOTAL MEM
SHARED 290313 1.1 GB 29% of TOTAL MEM
BUFFERS 554 2.2 MB 0% of TOTAL MEM
CACHED 40129611715 153082.3 GB 4136032% of TOTAL MEM
SLAB 49489 193.3 MB 5% of TOTAL MEM
TOTAL HUGE 0 0 ----
HUGE FREE 0 0 0% of TOTAL HUGE
TOTAL SWAP 1015807 3.9 GB ----
SWAP USED 0 0 0% of TOTAL SWAP
SWAP FREE 1015807 3.9 GB 100% of TOTAL SWAP
COMMIT LIMIT 1500929 5.7 GB ----
COMMITTED 104016 406.3 MB 6% of TOTAL LIMIT
crash>
and:
crash> kmem -i
PAGES TOTAL PERCENTAGE
TOTAL MEM 16439775 62.7 GB ----
FREE 15456286 59 GB 94% of TOTAL MEM
USED 983489 3.8 GB 5% of TOTAL MEM
SHARED 607536 2.3 GB 3% of TOTAL MEM
BUFFERS 1043 4.1 MB 0% of TOTAL MEM
CACHED 44353900800 169196.7 GB 269796% of TOTAL MEM
SLAB 75430 294.6 MB 0% of TOTAL MEM
TOTAL HUGE 0 0 ----
HUGE FREE 0 0 0% of TOTAL HUGE
TOTAL SWAP 3568639 13.6 GB ----
SWAP USED 0 0 0% of TOTAL SWAP
SWAP FREE 3568639 13.6 GB 100% of TOTAL SWAP
COMMIT LIMIT 11788526 45 GB ----
COMMITTED 89997 351.6 MB 0% of TOTAL LIMIT
crash>
Can you take a look at what happened in those dumpfiles? I'm
guessing there's some negative number involved somewhere.
I'll send a link to their download location in a private email.
Thanks,
Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
