Dave, sorry I need to run away. I'll reply tomorrow. And I need to actually read your emails first, perhaps I misunderstood you... Just one note, On 04/25, Dave Anderson wrote: > > As I see it, this facility is simply another LIVE_SYSTEM memory source, > of which there currently are /dev/mem, /proc/kcore and /dev/crash. The > essential difference between them is the pc->readmem plugin: Well yes, to some degree... But let me repeat, I believe that crash needs something like 1-7 (and probably more) anyway. Otherwise it can't work with remote LIVE_SYSTEM correctly. And while I think that 10/10 can be useful by itself (and least for me), this is mostly POC which which allows to test/justify these LOCAL_ACTIVE changes in 1-7. Oleg. -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
