----- Original Message ----- > Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Can you show a before-and-after example of the "kmem -s" and "kmem -S" > > output of a particular slab where your patch makes a difference? > > diff got about 80k. So attached compressed one. > > Thanks. > -- > OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I ran your patch against about ~CONFIG_SLUB kernels, and note that the major difference is that your patch shows many caches with a much smaller ALLOCATED count, and quite often a many slabs show "0" ALLOCATED, which I find hard to believe is correct. Here's an example. I ran your patch on a live 3.10-based kernel, and see these counts on the xfs-based caches: crash> kmem -s | grep -e OBJ -e xfs_ CACHE NAME OBJSIZE ALLOCATED TOTAL SLABS SSIZE ffff880035d54800 xfs_dqtrx 528 0 0 0 16k ffff880035d54700 xfs_dquot 472 0 0 0 16k ffff880035d54600 xfs_icr 144 0 0 0 4k ffff880035d54500 xfs_ili 152 362473 364000 14000 4k ffff880035d54400 xfs_inode 1024 478523 480510 16017 32k ffff880035d54300 xfs_efd_item 400 0 300 15 8k ffff880035d54200 xfs_da_state 480 0 272 8 16k ffff880035d54100 xfs_btree_cur 208 0 312 8 8k ffff880035d54000 xfs_log_ticket 184 3 682 31 4k crash> Note the last 4 caches above, which show ALLOCATED counts of 0, 0, 0 and 3. But then I look at /proc/slabinfo: crash> !cat /proc/slabinfo | grep -e active -e xfs_ # name <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab> <pagesperslab> : tunables <limit> <batchcount> <sharedfactor> : slabdata <active_slabs> <num_slabs> <sharedavail> xfs_dqtrx 0 0 528 31 4 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 0 0 0 xfs_dquot 0 0 472 34 4 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 0 0 0 xfs_icr 0 0 144 28 1 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 0 0 0 xfs_ili 362887 364000 152 26 1 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 14000 14000 0 xfs_inode 478639 480510 1088 30 8 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 16017 16017 0 xfs_efd_item 180 300 400 20 2 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 15 15 0 xfs_da_state 272 272 480 34 4 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 8 8 0 xfs_btree_cur 312 312 208 39 2 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 8 8 0 xfs_log_ticket 682 682 184 22 1 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 31 31 0 crash> which show 180, 272, 312 and 682 active counts. Can you explain the discrepancy? Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
