Hello That would be a possibility but I prefer if crash can calculate the correct number of cpus itself. If we just want to set the number of cpus to the number of cpus present, then the function “get_cpus_present()” could probably be used. Jan Jan Karlsson Senior Software Engineer System Assurance Sony Mobile Communications Tel: +46 703 062 174
From: crash-utility-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:crash-utility-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arun KS Hello Jan, Can you try with option --cpus=4 passed when your start the crash. I used 4 here because i have 4 cores. Thanks, Arun On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Karlsson, Jan <Jan.Karlsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Unfortunately I found another older example where my patch below did not work. In that one only cpu 0 where online but 0,1,2,3 where active. So maybe: return MAX(get_cpus_active(), get_highest_cpu_online()+1); might work better. Someone with better knowledge about this than I have should look at the problem. Jan Jan Karlsson Senior Software Engineer System Assurance Sony Mobile Communications Tel: +46 703 062 174
From: Karlsson, Jan Hi I have seen a problem when it comes to the number of cpus for ARM (32-bits). static int arm_get_smp_cpus(void) { return MAX(get_cpus_active(), get_cpus_online()); } In one of my example, “help –k” gives me: cpu_possible_map: 0 1 2 3 cpu_present_map: 0 1 2 3 cpu_online_map: 0 3 cpu_active_map: 3 So the number of cpus will become 2. However there are code in a number of places that will then only accept cpu 0 and 1 as cpus to handle. When I changed to code to be the same as for ARM64 things worked as expected: static int arm_get_smp_cpus(void) { return MAX(get_cpus_online(), get_highest_cpu_online()+1); } Jan Jan Karlsson Senior Software Engineer System Assurance Sony Mobile Communications Tel: +46 703 062 174
|
-- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
