----- Original Message ----- > Hi Dave, > > The rb_root pointer is pretty useless in our debugging. I thought about > removing it but decided not to do it thinking other people may need it. > I can get you another patch that removes the rb_root display from the > "group" line. Please let me know what you think. OK good, that's what I figured. And since the cfs_rq address is being displayed now, if it's really necessary to see the the rb_root, it can easily be accessed from there. No need for another patch -- I've been tinkering with the results of your changes. Thanks again, Dave > > Thanks, > Anthony > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: crash-utility-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:crash-utility- > > bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Anderson > > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:51 PM > > To: Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and > > development > > Subject: Re: patch for slight modification to runq -g > > command > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > My mistake, I didn't read your email carefully enough. Here's the > > > > new > > > > patch. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Anthony > > > > > > Thanks Anthony -- your changes are queued for crash-7.0.4. > > > > > > Dave > > > > Anthony, > > > > Given your interest in this command, I have a question re: the display. > > > > Do you ever have any interest in the rb_root addresses in each group? > > I'm thinking that with your patch adding the task_group and cfs_rq > > addresses, that the rb_root address is fairly useless. It was > > pretty much carried forward from the base "runq" command display, > > where it makes some sense. > > > > Dave > > > > > > -- > > Crash-utility mailing list > > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility > -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility