----- Original Message -----
> Hi Dave, Bryn,
>
> I've made some changes (see the attachments) to support the
> following:
>
> ARM, X86, X86_64, ALPHA, IA64 and S390
>
> Unfortunately these are the only definitions I could find at the moment.
> As per your suggestion, the command name has been changed to "pswap" which
> is more appropriate and the extension displays the swap count in pages by default.
> The '-k' option is added to display in kilobytes.
>
> The latest version is here [1].
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aaron
Hi Aaron,
Looks good, architecture-restrictions notwithstanding. With respect to
the -k option, maybe it would be helpful to add a "k" to the end of the
number, similar to the way it's done by the swap command?
crash> swap
FILENAME TYPE SIZE USED PCT PRIORITY
/dev/dm-0 PARTITION 9994236k 30980k 0% 0
crash>
The only other suggestion would be to make the help page a bit more
consistent with the other help pages:
crash> help pswap
NAME
pswap - Returns the actual swap consumption of a user process
SYNOPSIS
pswap [-k] [pid | taskp]
DESCRIPTION
This command obtains the swap consumption (in pages) of a user process.
The -k option can be used to print in kilobytes. Supported on ARM, X86, X86_64, ALPHA, IA64 and S390 only.
EXAMPLE
Show the swap consumption for pid 1288, 1232 and 663:
crash> pswap 1288 1232 663
PID SWAP COMM
1288 2100 audispd
1232 188 bluetoothd
663 3384 udevd
crash>
If no arguments are specified, every user process will be checked.
crash>
so that:
(1) all lines are 80 columns or less,
(2) the "If not arguments are specified..." line is moved up into the DESCRIPTION section.
(3) the EXAMPLE text is moved to the left, i,e., similar to other help page examples.
I've copied this latest version to the extensions page.
Thanks,
Dave
> ---
> [1]:
> https://github.com/aktlin115/crash-extension/blob/master/swap_usage.c
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Anderson" <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and
> development" <crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:41:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Thoughts on swap_usage Crash extension?
>
>
> Aaron,
>
> Bryn's name change and pte_file() suggestion make good sense.
>
> I also wonder if it's worth adding an option to alternatively display
> the swap count in pages? The only crash commands I can think of
> off-hand that use kilobytes are the "ps" and "swap" commands, and
> those were done that way because of the Linux commands of the same
> name. But when I want to see how much swap a process is using I
> do this to get a page count:
>
> crash> vm -p 1 | grep SWAP | wc -l
> 382
> crash>
>
> Or maybe just show both all the time? Just a thought...
>
> In any case, I've put the module in the crash extensions page as-is
> for now. When you're ready to update it, I'll just plug in your
> latest-and-greatest version.
>
> http://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions.html
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi Bryn,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> > I'll work on it. With regards to the name change, I think it's
> > worth
> > changing it to 'pswap'.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Aaron
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and
> > development" <crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Aaron Tomlin" <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:51:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: Thoughts on swap_usage Crash
> > extension?
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 01/30/2013 01:17 PM, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> > > I've made some changes [1] and included the help page, as per
> > > your
> > > request. It's still x86_64 specific for now. What do you think?
> > > [1]:
> > > https://github.com/aktlin115/crash-extension/blob/master/swap_usage.c
> >
> > Hi
> > >
> > Aaron,
> >
> > Extension looks useful. I was wondering about the name - would you
> > consider renaming it as 'pswap'? It's less to type than swap_usage
> > (as
> > there's already a 'swap' command but nothing 'psw*').
> >
> > For the _PAGE_FILE problem it might be possible to address this by
> > providing a wrapper like the pte_file() interface defined by arch
> > headers in the kernel sources.
> >
> > There seem to be 11 arches (inc. x86 and powerpc) using
> > (pte_val(pte)
> > & _PAGE_FILE) idiom. Of the rest s390 has a well-commented
> > explanation
> > of its special cases and ARM uses a different name for the bit:
> >
> > #define pte_file(pte) (pte_val(pte) & L_PTE_FILE)
> >
> > It seems like these could all be handled quite reasonably (actually
> > the number that are identical maybe it's the case that this could
> > be
> > tidied up in the kernel so that arches that really need custom
> > versions can override pte_file() but that's not really my area).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bryn.
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> >
> > iEYEARECAAYFAlEJJWcACgkQ6YSQoMYUY97PKwCfa6ZuC2MuTrYa2E42WSEkBPjM
> > 234An1RQFlRxrDFgMu/cxdhEMzfsRGGZ
> > =VY7a
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > --
> > Crash-utility mailing list
> > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
> >
>
> --
> Crash-utility mailing list
> Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
> --
> Crash-utility mailing list
> Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
