Below you find my version of the ptov function. I have just added a few lines and placed them under "#if defined(ARM)". The test is reasonable for ARM so I would appreciate if you include it. For other platforms please do whatever you like.
Jan
void
cmd_ptov(void)
{
int c;
ulong vaddr;
physaddr_t paddr;
#if defined(ARM)
physaddr_t paddr_tst;
#endif
char buf1[BUFSIZE];
char buf2[BUFSIZE];
int others;
while ((c = getopt(argcnt, args, "")) != EOF) {
switch(c)
{
default:
argerrs++;
break;
}
}
if (argerrs || !args[optind])
cmd_usage(pc->curcmd, SYNOPSIS);
others = 0;
while (args[optind]) {
paddr = htoll(args[optind], FAULT_ON_ERROR, NULL);
vaddr = PTOV(paddr);
#if defined(ARM)
if (kvtop(0, vaddr, &paddr_tst, 0) && paddr_tst==paddr) {
#endif
fprintf(fp, "%s%s %s\n", others++ ? "\n" : "",
mkstring(buf1, VADDR_PRLEN, LJUST, "VIRTUAL"),
mkstring(buf2, VADDR_PRLEN, LJUST, "PHYSICAL"));
fprintf(fp, "%s %s\n",
mkstring(buf1, VADDR_PRLEN, LJUST|LONG_HEX, MKSTR(vaddr)),
mkstring(buf2, VADDR_PRLEN, LJUST|LONGLONG_HEX,
MKSTR(&paddr)));
#if defined(ARM)
} else {
fprintf(fp, "Unknown virtual address for physical address 0x%08llx\n", paddr);
}
#endif
optind++;
}
}
Jan Karlsson
Senior Software Engineer
MIB
Sony Mobile Communications
Tel: +46703062174
sonymobile.com
-----Original Message-----
From: crash-utility-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:crash-utility-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Anderson
Sent: torsdag den 5 juli 2012 15:48
To: Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development
Subject: Re: ptov command
----- Original Message -----
>
> Hi Dave
>
> I have a question about the ptov command. Ptov only handles kernel
> virtual addresses and their corresponding physical addresses.
> However if you give ptov a physical address that does not correspond
> to a kernel virtual address it still answers with an address. Users
> might get confused and do not know when to trust ptov, especially as
> the inverse command vtop always works.
>
> So I would like to restrict ptov to give a result only when it is
> valid. The idea I have is that if ptov returns a valid virtual
> address then vtop on that address should give the same physical
> address back again. True??
>
> cmd_ptov() in memory.c
>
> ....
>
> vaddr = PTOV(paddr);
> kvtop(0, vaddr, &paddr_tst, 0);
> if (paddr != paddr_tst) ... invalid vaddr, do not print it ...
>
> Any comments?
>
> Jan
Sounds reasonable, at least for the 32-bit arches. I don't think it's
necessary for any 64-bit arch. And you'd also need to account for kvtop()
failing outright (and returning FALSE).
Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
