Hi Dave, On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:45:55 -0400 (EDT) Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > > So I suppose we *could* have a new crash "block" environment variable, > settable with the "set" command, and then while it's in play you would > see stuff based upon that particular scope. Hmmm... > > I just wonder if it's worth it given the parcity of actual examples of > multiple structs with the same name. That's why I'm wondering if > anybody else on the list has run into this kind of problem? If I remember correctly, I already had such a problem some time ago and IMHO it would be very useful to have the possibility in crash to define the current context. Michael -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
