At 2012-6-6 21:44, Petr Tesarik wrote:
crash> list task_struct.tasks -s task_struct.tasks -h 0xeede04f0+432
eede04f0
tasks = {
next = 0xd79d6f20,
prev = 0xd55e6220
}
d79d6d70
tasks = {
next = 0xc32c5320,
prev = 0xeede06a0
}
...
Note that the first element in the list (the one which contains the starting
list_head) is included.
Based on the above, I'm afraid don't quite get the intended goal of your
patch.
Hello Petr and Dave,
I misunderstood the usage.
What I really think is changing the start address from the address of
list_head to the address of the structure where list_head is embedded.
In many cases I use list command, I found I can get the address of the
structure where the list_head embedded directly. And I can get the
offset of list_head by -o option. So the offset, say "+432" in your
example, can be omitted. What do you think of such change?
--
--
Regards
Qiao Nuohan
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
