----- Original Message -----
> At 2012/5/9 21:25, Dave Anderson Wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Hello HATAYAMA,
> >>
> >> I am trying to add a new command can be used to display rbtree and
> >> radix tree. After some investigation, I find they are similar to the
> >> build-in command "list". So I send this mail to ask your opinion about
> >> making cmd_list to be similar to the command "struct/union/*".
> >
> > Having radix_tree and rbtree enumerators is a good idea.
> >
> > But before you get started, please do *not* pollute the cmd_list()
> > function with these two facilities. Make it a separate command
> > ("tree" perhaps?) that can branch and handle the two different
> > tree types.
> >
> > It would also be helpful if the interfaces could be made available for
> > use by other commands, i.e., similar to the way that the "irq" command
> > uses the do_radix_tree() function in filesys.c, or the way that do_list()
> > is used by cmd_list(), but is also available as a general purpose function
> > for other commands.
>
> Hmm, the interfaces is made available for use by other commands,
> do you mean that the new command(tree?) can be a built-in command?
That's right. Given its general nature, a command that dumps the
contents of the two tree variants would be a good candidate for a
built-in command.
Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
