Hello Hatayama-san, On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:26:08 +0900 ( ) HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW, I have a question about future build option of LZO library. You > said previously you're going to introduce autotools. Then, do you > consider default enable if LZO library is present on the environment? I'm afraid I decide not to introduce autotools for the following reasons. First, because autotools cannot know whether LZO library is prepared in 2nd kernel environment, it cannot decide whether it should link LZO library dynamically even if LINKTYPE=dynamic is specified. Second, if autotools behaves differently depending on LINKTYPE, it is difficult for users to understand. So, I think that current method is simpler and better than autotools. Thanks Atsushi Kumagai -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
