----- Original Message ----- > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > Hello Dave, > > > > > > I have modified my patch. In my opinion, regular expression should not > > > mix with other task-identifying arguments, so I made some more modifications > > > > Why not? It would be far more useful if you could maintain > > the current capability of providing a mixture of pid/task/name > > task-identifiers along with this new regular-expression-matching > > scheme. > > > > Dave > > In fact, I've just reworked (and simplified) your patch so that a > 'regex' task identifier may be used in conjunction with the other > task identifier types, make the capability much more useful. > > In fact, it could be modified even further to allow multiple > regular expression arguments to be allowed, by maintaining > an regex_t array the same way as it's done for the other > supported task identifiers. I'll try that... > > Dave Done! With that capability, this a pretty powerful task-identifier. Thanks for getting the ball rolling -- queued for crash-6.0.5. Thanks, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
