Hi Hatayama, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:33 PM, HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Lei, > > Thanks for making patch. I'll check your patch this week, but I have > two things to ask you. > > 1. I don't know arm architecture at all and I don't have arm > machine. What I can do is only testing common part and regression test > on x86 architecture. Please maintain arm part yourself. Sure, it is my pleasure. :) > > 2. Could you tell me specific kernel versions you have tested this > patch in? I myself have yet to do this, but now I think it necessary > to make such a list. I imagine just like makedumpfile's SUPPORTED > KERNELS described in its README. I'll put them in gcore's README and > then ask Dave to add them into description in distribution page. I am current testing with kernel 2.6.35.7 and 3.0.8, and they are both ok. But I see below warnings during extracting, while the extracted core dump image is OK for gdb, I don't know whether it there is still some missing in original implementation, or those pages just don't existed in memory? gcore: PT_LOAD[165]: af900000 - af90e000 gcore: WARNING: page fault at af909000 gcore: WARNING: page fault at af90d000 > > Thanks. > HATAYAMA, Daisuke Thanks, Lei -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
