Hello Dave, On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:09 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > Or is there any other way that the panic'ing task can be ascertained from > > > "S390D" dumpfiles such that get_dumpfile_panic_task() can do the job? > > > > Hmmm, I don't think so. Probably the only way is to search die or panic > > on the stack. Perhaps we can do that without the -t option? > > Michael, > > Since you're actively updating the s390 upstream kdump code, maybe you > could consider adding a "crashing_cpu", or even better, something like a > "crashing_task" variable? Hmmm, that probably should be done in common code, no? Maybe adding this information to vmcoreinfo would also be an option. But I am not sure if I feel like having more kdump upstream discussions at the moment :-) Michael -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
