On 24 June 2011 14:40, Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And for that matter, since tty->read_cnt is 0 above,
your original question as to how that code path was taken to
begin with is also valid.
Surely that implies tty->read_cnt has been modified since it was tested, and hence you're looking at concurrency issues?
-- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
