On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:11:35PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > > > And I guess VTOP/PTOV needs modification in accordance with > > __phys_to_virt and __virt_to_phys. > > Right... > > Ultimately it will be advisable to extract the ARM VTOP() and PTOV() > macros into machine-dependent functions, i.e., similar to the X86_64 > and IA64 architectures. And in those functions, intelligence will > have to be applied to determine how to handle the various ARM types. I agree. We need to start to separate different ARM platforms where normal v<->p rules don't apply and add necessary code to perform the translations. -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
