Hello Dave, On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:13 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > I'm not particularly enamored with the use of the zero-filled > > > "double-number" frame fields -- mainly because it's different > > > than all of the other architectures (even the s390). > > > The other arches just move the asterisk one field to the left if the > > > frame > > > number goes into double figures, keeping the remaining fields > > > lined up: > > > > > > fprintf(fp, "%s#%d [ ... > > > level < 10 ? " " : "", > > > > > > While I try not to interfere with architecture maintainers, > > > is there a particular reason you want to do it that way? > > > > No problem. This is also fine with me. Should I change this or do you > > want to do that? > > > > Michael > > I just changed print_frame() to do it. And, sorry -- I didn't mean > to twist your arm... ;-) It is good to keep the architectures as similar as possible. That's part of your job :-) > > Queued for 5.1.15. Thanks! Michael -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
