Hello Dave, On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:56 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > Hi Michael, > > A couple minor points about this patch... > > I moved the two new offset_table entries to the end of > the structure. Since the offset_table is exported to extension > modules, changing members in the middle of the structure could > easily break a module that was compiled against an earlier > version. And I added displays of the new offset_table and > size_table entries in dump_offset_table() used by "help -o". Fine, thanks! > I'm not particularly enamored with the use of the zero-filled > "double-number" frame fields -- mainly because it's different > than all of the other architectures (even the s390). > The other arches just move the asterisk one field to the left if the frame > number goes into double figures, keeping the remaining fields > lined up: > > fprintf(fp, "%s#%d [ ... > level < 10 ? " " : "", > > While I try not to interfere with architecture maintainers, > is there a particular reason you want to do it that way? No problem. This is also fine with me. Should I change this or do you want to do that? Michael -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
