Hello Dave, From: Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] gcore extension module: user-mode process core dump Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:34:35 -0500 (EST) > To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development" <crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:34:35 -0500 (EST) > X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.9_GA_2686 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.9_GA_2686) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hello Dave, >> >> I've just fixed gcore. The patset is attached to this mail. >> >> Could you review and apply them if okay? > > Can you create a gcore.tar.bz2 file like you did with the last > patch-set? > > I will write up a new entry on the "extensions" page on my people > site here: http://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions.html > > Since the module has so many files, I'll put a link to the > gcore.tar.bz2 file, instructions on how to set it up, etc, > in the description of gcore. In fact, I've already done that > on a scratch page here: > > http://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions2.html Thanks for setting up them. I've attached gcore.tar.bz2 as you suggested. Please confirm it. In addition, I've improved restore_frame_pointer(). I expect gcore hang up can no longer be reproduced. Well, I have a question: in what form should I send new patchset afterwards? A whole files in the form of gcore.tar.bz2 similaly? or in the form of diffs? Thanks. HATAYAMA
Attachment:
gcore.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data
-- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
