----- "Toshikazu Nakayama" <nakayama.ts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Dave, > > >Hello Toshi, > > > >I made several changes to your last patch as we discussed before, > >and successfully tested it on the x86, x86_64, ia64, s390 and s390x > >architectures. > > > >I've attached the patch as it is queued for the next release. > > > >Because I was working against my own updated tree, the patch also > >contains a couple other symbol-handling related changes that are > >also queued for the next release. > > > >Thanks for getting the ball rolling for this feature, > > Dave > > Because your patch could not apply to crash-5.0.9 with patch command, > I manually apply them and they can run well over my environs. Hmmm -- works for me: # tar xzf crash-5.0.9.tar.gz # cd crash-5.0.9 # patch -p1 < $HOME/symbols.patch patching file help.c patching file kernel.c patching file alpha.c patching file ppc.c patching file s390.c patching file s390x.c patching file ppc64.c patching file x86_64.c patching file symbols.c patching file lkcd_x86_trace.c patching file unwind.c patching file defs.h # Maybe you were trying to apply them on top of your last patch? Anyway, as long as you're happy with the end result... > I'll use crash-5.0.9 with your patch > until crash-5.0.10 got available. > > I saw that you've updated whole places where per-cpu or MODULE_SYMBOL > should be applicable in crash utility. > Thanks again Toshi, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
