----- "Sami Liedes" <sliedes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:07:10AM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > How did you come up with the "131" size? > > Just by adding debugging prints and inspecting the qcow2 image. So it > may be very much incorrect, except in this one case. Damn -- this "borrowed usage" of the savevm format for virsh dump is really getting to be a pain in the ass... Looking at the qemu-kvm sources, it's not obvious to me what the size of the the "slirp" device would be in the dumpfile. And apparently Red Hat kernels don't use that device or somebody else would have bumped into it, but I'll check with Paolo Bonzini to verify the number. Thanks, Dave
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
