----- hutao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:55:38AM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >
> > ----- hutao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:46:00PM +0800, hutao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I got a problem where it seemed crash got a bad backtrace.
> > > > The problem occurred under the following conditions:
> > > > On a qemu guest system loading a module that stuck at
> > > > the init function(say, call a function that did deadlooping),
> > > > then dumped the guest by `virsh dump vm dumpfile', and run
> > > > crash on the dumpfile.
> > > >
> > > > The module is:
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > >
> > > > int endless_loop(void)
> > > > {
> > > > printk("endless loop\n");
> > > > while (1);
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > int __init endless_init(void)
> > > > {
> > > > endless_loop();
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > module_init(endless_init);
> > > >
> > > > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > crash bt command got:
> > > >
> > > > crash> bt -a
> > > > PID: 0 TASK: ffffffff81648020 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "swapper"
> > > > #0 [ffffffff81601e08] schedule at ffffffff813e8a49
> > > > #1 [ffffffff81601e18] apic_timer_interrupt at ffffffff8100344e
> > > > #2 [ffffffff81601ea0] need_resched at ffffffff8100970c
> > > > #3 [ffffffff81601eb0] default_idle at ffffffff81009f6b
> > > > #4 [ffffffff81601ec0] cpu_idle at ffffffff81001bf5
> > > >
> > > > PID: 1088 TASK: ffff88001dda2d60 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "insmod"
> > > > #0 [ffff88001e751dc8] schedule at ffffffff813e8a49
> > > > #1 [ffff88001e751dd0] schedule at ffffffff813e8aec
> > > > #2 [ffff88001e751e80] preempt_schedule_irq at ffffffff813e8c90
> > > > #3 [ffff88001e751e90] retint_kernel at ffffffff813eab86
> > > > #4 [ffff88001e751f20] do_one_initcall at ffffffff81000210
> > > > #5 [ffff88001e751f50] sys_init_module at ffffffff8106b7ca
> > > > #6 [ffff88001e751f80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff81002a82
> > > > RIP: 00007f761bb58b7a RSP: 00007fff67a43120 RFLAGS: 00010206
> > > > RAX: 00000000000000af RBX: ffffffff81002a82 RCX: 0000000000020010
> > > > RDX: 0000000000b96010 RSI: 00000000000163da RDI: 0000000000b96030
> > > > RBP: 0000000000b96010 R8: 0000000000010011 R9: 0000000000080000
> > > > R10: 00007f761bb4b140 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00000000000163da
> > > > R13: 00007fff67a44985 R14: 00000000000163da R15: 0000000000b96010
> > > > ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000af CS: 0033 SS: 002b
> > > >
> > > > Does it lose some function calls between do_one_initcall and retint_kernel?
> > > > (endless_loop <- endless_init)
> > > >
> > >
> > > In addition, if we don't stick in the init function (there is still a deadloop
> > > somewhere in module but triggered by, say, reading a /proc file) then the backtrace
> > > outputed by crash is correct.
> >
> > When you say "correct", I presume that you see your module functions as frames.
> > But if you also see the backtrace starting with "schedule", then it's just luck
> > that the backtrace bumped into your module functions. It just so happened that
> > when walking back from schedule(), it "mistakenly" stumbled upon your module's
> > functions.
> >
> > In the example above, I presume that when trying to backtrace from retint_kernel(),
> > it stepped over your module's "loop" functions that were called via do_one_initcall().
> > That's why I suggest that you should probably see them on the kernel stack in
> > between ffff88001e751e90 and ffff88001e751f20 if you use "bt -t". That is what
> > "bt -t" is for -- the "bt" command is never guaranteed to be correct.
>
> Nothing new in between ffff88001e751e90 and ffff88001e751f20 with `bt -at':
>
> crash> bt -at
> PID: 0 TASK: ffffffff81648020 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "swapper"
> START: schedule at ffffffff813e8a49
> [ffffffff81601e18] apic_timer_interrupt at ffffffff8100344e
> [ffffffff81601e60] __atomic_notifier_call_chain at ffffffff813ed799
> [ffffffff81601ea0] need_resched at ffffffff8100970c
> [ffffffff81601eb0] default_idle at ffffffff81009f6b
> [ffffffff81601ec0] cpu_idle at ffffffff81001bf5
> [ffffffff81601f10] rest_init at ffffffff813d72ec
> [ffffffff81601f30] start_kernel at ffffffff816e1d77
> [ffffffff81601f40] command_line at ffffffff81718e90
> [ffffffff81601f70] x86_64_start_reservations at ffffffff816e12ac
> [ffffffff81601f90] x86_64_start_kernel at ffffffff816e13a8
>
> PID: 1088 TASK: ffff88001dda2d60 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "insmod"
> START: schedule at ffffffff813e8a49
> [ffff88001e751dd0] schedule at ffffffff813e8aec
> [ffff88001e751e40] get_parent_ip at ffffffff8102f193
> [ffff88001e751e60] sub_preempt_count at ffffffff813ed62c
> [ffff88001e751e70] need_resched at ffffffff8102a975
> [ffff88001e751e80] preempt_schedule_irq at ffffffff813e8c90
> [ffff88001e751e90] retint_kernel at ffffffff813eab86
> [ffff88001e751f20] do_one_initcall at ffffffff81000210
> [ffff88001e751f50] sys_init_module at ffffffff8106b7ca
> [ffff88001e751f80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff81002a82
> RIP: 00007f761bb58b7a RSP: 00007fff67a43120 RFLAGS: 00010206
> RAX: 00000000000000af RBX: ffffffff81002a82 RCX: 0000000000020010
> RDX: 0000000000b96010 RSI: 00000000000163da RDI: 0000000000b96030
> RBP: 0000000000b96010 R8: 0000000000010011 R9: 0000000000080000
> R10: 00007f761bb4b140 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00000000000163da
> R13: 00007fff67a44985 R14: 00000000000163da R15: 0000000000b96010
> ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000af CS: 0033 SS: 002b
> crash>
>
>
> This is the related part of output of `bt -ar' in case you're
> interested:
>
> ffff88001e751e60: sub_preempt_count+146 ffff88001e751e78
> ffff88001e751e70: need_resched+30 ffff88001e751e88
> ffff88001e751e80: preempt_schedule_irq+82 ffff88001e751f18
> ffff88001e751e90: retint_kernel+38 ffff88001e751dd8
> ffff88001e751ea0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000004
> ffff88001e751eb0: 0000000000000000 ffff88001e751fd8
> ffff88001e751ec0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
> ffff88001e751ed0: 0000000000000000 ffffffffa00f9000
> ffff88001e751ee0: ffffffffffffff10 ffffffffa00f9004
> ffff88001e751ef0: 0000000000000010 0000000000000246
> ffff88001e751f00: ffff88001e751f18 0000000000000018
> ffff88001e751f10: ffff8800ffffffff ffff88001e751f48
> ffff88001e751f20: do_one_initcall+122 __this_module
> ffff88001e751f30: 0000000000000000 0000000000020000
> ffff88001e751f40: 0000000000b96030 ffff88001e751f78
> ffff88001e751f50: sys_init_module+196 0000000000b96010
> ffff88001e751f60: 00000000000163da 00007fff67a44985
> ffff88001e751f70: 00000000000163da 0000000000b96010
> ffff88001e751f80: system_call_fastpath+22 0000000000000202
> ffff88001e751f90: 00007f761bb4b140 0000000000080000
> ffff88001e751fa0: 0000000000010011 00000000000000af
> ffff88001e751fb0: 0000000000020010 0000000000b96010
> ffff88001e751fc0: 00000000000163da 0000000000b96030
> ffff88001e751fd0: 00000000000000af 00007f761bb58b7a
> ffff88001e751fe0: 0000000000000033 0000000000010206
> ffff88001e751ff0: 00007fff67a43120 000000000000002b
>
> and `sym -m endless':
>
> crash> sym -m endless
> ffffffffa00f6000 MODULE START: endless
> ffffffffa00f6000 (?) endless_loop
> ffffffffa00f6030 (r) __ksymtab_endless_loop
> ffffffffa00f6040 (r) __kstrtab_endless_loop
> ffffffffa00f6050 (d) __this_module
> ffffffffa00f6345 MODULE END: endless
> crash>
Well in that case, there is no evidence left on the kernel stack
by the endless_loop() function, i.e., the return address back
to endless_loop() from from its call to printk().
Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
