Re: Why are there two ways of getting register values for active tasks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Daisuke HATAYAMA" <d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, all.
> 
> I have a question on the implementation of get_netdump_regs_x86_64().
> 
> Currently, in order to get register values for active tasks, only
> panic task makes use of note information. On the other hand, other
> active tasks search stack frame for registers saved at nmi
> switch. However, crash dump contains the note information for every
> CPUs, so I think it uncessary to search stack frame.

Originally it was done that way because the code was written for 
netdump-generated dumpfiles, which only generated note information
for the panic task.  But if I'm not mistaken, given that recent
kernels do not store debuginfo data for the user_regs_struct, it
almost always falls through into x86_64_get_stack_frame(). 

Dave

--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

 

Powered by Linux