----- "Sergey Svishchev" <svs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dave Anderson wrote: > > >> See also > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crash/+bug/559219 > >> > >> -- > >> Sergey Svishchev > > > > BTW, if you follow the advice in the ubuntu bug description, does > > the crash session work normally? > > (It's my bug report :-) > > Yes, mostly. Date is wrong (DATE: Sun Oct 26 03:35:21 2594), 'bt' > reports some errors but otherwise backtraces look sane. > > crash> bt > PID: 0 TASK: ffffffff81796600 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "swapper" > #0 [ffffffff8176fe58] schedule at ffffffff81525251 > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 41 type: "call byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 6db6db6db6db6db2 type: "call > byte" > bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 937fb type: "call byte" > #1 [ffffffff8176ff00] cpu_idle at ffffffff81010e45 > > -- > Sergey Svishchev Yeah, something is still askew. I just got this from Paolo Bonzini, the author of the qemu-related code in crash: > > By any chance do you have any insights re: the structure-related > > changes associated with CPU_SAVE_VERSION?. This is an upstream bug > > report, but I note that in qemu-kvm-0.11.0-rc1.fc12.i686, it's equal > > to 10 in target-i386/cpu.h. > > It needs an update for newer qemus. I'll take a look, as probably > we'd want this on RHEL6 too (or maybe not, I used crash/kvm on RHEL6 > about a month ago). > > Paolo Please keep that dump around for an upcoming test patch... Thanks, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
