----- "Luc Chouinard" <Luc.Chouinard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Got it. > Yes, this is the proper fix. > Please go ahead and submit it. > Thanks. > > -Luc > Queued for the next release. Dave > > > > Agreed, so would the following be the correct patch? > > --- > > extensions/sial.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > --- a/extensions/sial.c > > +++ b/extensions/sial.c > > @@ -292,6 +292,10 @@ int nidx=0; > > type=0; > > break; > > > > + case TYPE_CODE_BOOL: > > + sial_parsetype("char", t, ref); > > + type=0; > > + break; > > case TYPE_CODE_UNION: > > sial_type_mkunion(t); > > goto label; > > > > > > -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility