Dave, On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 16:56 -0500, Dave Anderson wrote: > ----- "Michael Holzheu" <holzheu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry, I did not read your note carefully. If you want to do that then > > my current implementation is wrong. The problem is that now I expect ELF > > note structures and will always do. It is not possible to support > > multiple dump formats with my current approach. > > Sure it's possible. In the (unlikely) case s390x ever needs to support anything > else, the first int argument can be made a uniquely-identifiable "command" > or some such. First of all: It is VERY likely that we will support a new dump format in the near future. Believe me. Second, how should that work? The callback has an integer and a void pointer. The integer is currently used to specify the CPU number. The void pointer is used to hold the ELF note information. How the hell can I code the information for a new dump format. Or am I missing something? Michael -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
