----- "Sumeet Gupta" <meetsumeet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On a side-topic - is an ARM port of this utility (ie, a vmcore > > generated on an ARM system, debugged with crash offline on X86) > > available, or in the offing? > > > None that I'm aware of. It was brought up on this list some time > > ago, and I gave the requester some initial guidance on the steps > > to take in order to add support for a new architecture. But I've > > heard nothing since then. > > > If you could give me a link to your previous mail having the guidance steps, that would be helpful. https://www.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/2007-August/msg00005.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/2007-August/msg00017.html The sketchy directions I gave were for supporting an architecture as is done today, i.e., such that the host machine type would run its arch-specific crash utility binary. The only "cross-arch" support is the x86_64's capability of running a 32-bit x86 binary. (and perhaps the same can be done on an ia64). But to run an x86 binary to view an ARM dumpfile would be yet another level of complexity for which there's no support. There is a "cross-crash" utility maintained elsewhere -- I don't know where or not it's still active -- and which if I'm not mistaken, supports running an x86 crash binary to look at a MIPS vmcore. There also was a group doing the same kind of thing for using an x86 binary to look at 32-bit ppc vmcores. But again, I have no details on either initiative. Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
