----- "Michael Holzheu" <holzheu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 09:04 -0400 schrieb Dave Anderson: > > ----- "Wei Jiang" <talk90091e@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In my test, I did not see any exceptions else due to my 32bits dump > > > file is corrupted. As you know, a incorrect nr_cpus will > > > lead to some following fields(dha_smp_current_task, dha_stack) are > > > pointed to a error location, which might be a potential defect and > > > will be raised in future. > > > > Actually I don't know -- so that's why I asked. I almost never see > > an LKCD dumpfile. > > > > Just FYI: For s390 we still use the lkcd dump format in some cases. > Therefore we still need the support in crash. No problem -- I understand. I didn't mean to imply that LKCD support was being dropped. But I am operating in the blind here, and I just wanted as much information about what the end result of the i386 header inconsistency was. And I still prefer not to tinker with the LKCD files unless I get a sign-off from folks like yourself who still use it. Thanks, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
