On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 20:23 +0000, Dave Anderson wrote: > ----- "Bob Montgomery" <bob.montgomery@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > But anyway, given the command's current capability, do you think that the > alternative -f option should just be thrown out, and that all devices > should be dumped regardless whether they have file_operations associated > with them or not? Since the dev command has a prior history of saying "(none)", you might as well let crash reveal everything it finds (including the (none) entries). Then you can avoid telling folks about the "-f" option. So I vote for showing it all with just "dev". Eventually someone who really understands it can explain why it is or isn't meaningful to reveal an entry that has a NULL ops field. But for now, hide nothing :-) Bob Montgomery -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
