----- "Michael Holzheu" <holzheu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Am Dienstag, den 21.04.2009, 08:53 -0400 schrieb Dave Anderson: > > Not that I'm aware of -- you volunteering? > > That was not the intention of my mail :-) Oh -- I must have misinterpreted the tone of your voice! > > > Looks like all 3 cpu_xxx_map references (online, present and possible) > > that crash potentially uses need to be able to recognize and handle the > > need to access them via their cpu_xxx_mask variables. And as always, > > to maintain backwards-compatibility, i.e., to recognize when neither > > cpu_xxx_map and cpu_xxx_mask exist, such as in really older kernels... > > > > Let us know if you can undertake the task. > > I can't promise anything. Maybe I find some time this or next > week. OK thanks, just let me know. BTW, if you happen to have a sample vmlinux/dumpfile pair (non-s390-ish) of that kernel vintage that you can make available to me, I can take a look at it. Thanks, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
