----- "Itsuro ODA" <oda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > It is a good question. > I checked about i386. __per_cpu_data_end - __per_cpu_start is smaller > than 4K, but PERCPU_SHIFT is 13 (it is common both x86_32 and > x86_64). > Oops. > > I will consider more. Ok, I'll wait for a new patch set. Another direction that you might consider is to check whether a new symbol was introduced in the same patch-set that incremented the PERCPU_SHIFT values? Or take Keir up on his offer to compile-in an absolute value that can be accessed like a symbol? As far as the UPTIME display, it will probably raise fewer questions in the future if you would just remove it entirely. Thanks, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
