Hi, Yes, it is one option. (If I can not find any good idea, I will select this.) Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:03:48 +0100 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3/10/08 07:02, "Itsuro ODA" <oda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I need to think the backword compatibility. I wonder how to determine > > the value of "PERCPU_SHIFT". The change of "PERCPU_SHIFT" was made at > > a certain point of xen-unstable before xen-3.3 release. The xen version > > number (3.3) can't use as key... I will consider more... > > Is the problem easier if you don't try to support every random snapshot of > xen-unstable? Why not constrain yourself to stable releases (or even random > snapshots of stable branches): then you could indeed just look for >=3.3? > > -- Keir > > -- Itsuro ODA <oda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
