Hey, that's what keeps us employed, right?! If it was easy EVERYONE would be doing it! :-) Thanks for the input guys. Paul On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Dave Anderson wrote: > Paul Sanders wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I'm trying to get myself ramped to using crash on x86_64. > > > > In x86_64 there is no register stack and function arguments aren't > > typically placed on the stack, therefore we aren't able to see the > > function arguments in the bt -f output. > > > > Is there a trick to dumping out %rdi, %rsi, %rdx, etc? > > > > I hope this isn't too lame of a question. I'm just getting my toes wet > > with x86_64 and kdump/crash. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Paul Sanders > > SGI Global Product Support > > James is right -- aside from the register dumps with each exception frame, > you're pretty much on your own. You'll have to disassemble the functions > of interest from their last "known" value/location/frame, and following > where the register may be stored on the stack. Sorry -- no tricks... > > Dave > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility > -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility