Hi, * Dave Anderson [2008-05-14 08:56]: > > Thanks for digging into this. I agree with you on all counts. > > One final question: does the remaining call to __builtin_return_address(0) > in tools.c:getbuf() fail in your configuration as well? Yes. __builtin_return_address(0) works in all configurations and is also guaranteed to work with gcc. Only __builtin_return_address(n) with n > 0 makes problems when the frame pointer is omitted (which is the default with -O2). Bernhard -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
