On 05/02/07 11:06, Dave Anderson wrote: > And adding a bunch of new LKCD files at this point in its life-time > is not all that appealing if it can be avoided. I agree. > > It fixed a problem here where I head a crash dump from a customer > > using LKCD that showed a totally wrong backtrace in crash but lcrash > > worked fine. I'm curious to know more about the unwind bug and if there is another approach that can be taken to resolve it. Unwinding on IA-64 has been pretty solid in the past, so I'm curious to know what the underlying problem is. I haven't worked with any 2.6 kernels (> 2.6.10) kernels and LKCD. Bernhard, since you've already debugged this, can you think of a way to enhance get_lkcd_regs() to catch the eip as an alternative solution? In other words, why did it miss finding the eip in your dump? Troy -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility