On 01/17/07 17:46, Bernhard Walle wrote: > I think it's too specific (the part that detemines the position of the > load daddress), but at least I think the LKCD IA64 maintainer should > take a look at the problem that CONFIG_NR_CPU in kernel must be equal > to the CPU define in crash and find a solution for this. I agree, the patch is to specific. I also like the NR_CPU calculation. Bernhard, can you workup a patch that just does the NR_CPU calc and skips the header moves? Thanks, Troy -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
