Hi, Though I wish it is merged into crash finally, I understand it is early to merge at this time since kdump for xen hypervisor (and also dom0cut) is in still unstable-tree of xen development. So xencrash is usefull only for xen developers now. I think it is a good timing to merge when kdump for xen hypervisor become stable and a distribution such as RedHat adopt it. Thanks. Itsuro ODA On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:36:14 -0500 Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dave Anderson wrote: > > > Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0900, Itsuro ODA wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This is an update of crash analisys tool for Xen hypervisor. > > > > (posted 2006/10/30) > > > > > > > > > > Hi Itsuro, > > > > > > I got a very basic question. Why to have a separate utility which is > > > basically crash and some patches on top of it. Why can't we merge it > > > in crash itself? > > > > That's the beauty of it -- it does exactly what you're suggesting! > > > > Vivek, > > BTW, if I wasn't clear, I *do* plan on merging Itsuro's patch > as soon as I'm happy with it... > > Dave > > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility -- Itsuro ODA <oda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
